Monday, April 13, 2009

Penthouse Reading Forum Letters

The fissure in" Le Monde Diplomatique "The favorite game

In April last issue of Le Monde Diplomatique "Osvaldo Gallone critical signs The fissure of Rolando. The reproduce:


During the first part of the novel, Roland writes because he can not speak (aphasia strange has left him mute), the second part, speaks to translate in recording oral writing a hilarious ( alternative therapy with licensed character Danilo Moran). If one accepts that the books talk to each other (Inevitable exchange any relationship recognized under the influence or academic deliberate intertextuality), this novel remains a fruitful dialogue Banez and fluid with the best stories of Isidore Blaisten and happiest moments of his only novel (The Night) . The fissure of Rolando shows full-and if you need to do-that the novel is essentially an operation where the explanation is language and innuendo harmful raises a beneficial effect and multiplier. In the first part, the author does not need to define an epochal framework, it suffices to recall some words of his own childhood: "engañapichanga" Corso " "Menhaden." The second part is crossed by the varieties of psychoanalytic jargon and impeccable parody. Banez's novel is a grotesque notable that dwells on the jargon, but to neutralize the instrumentation, which boasts a clear prose that essentially builds a character played and believable: Rolando. It would be unfair not to mention that some scenes played between Roland and his therapist in the second part of the book are memorable, considering that Rolando is a gullible and compliant patient, and that his therapist is defined as part of the current "Lacanian- Peronist. "

0 comments:

Post a Comment